PRESS RELEASE February 2022Fire Experts Warn Against State Board Changes to Fire Safe Regulations as Board of Forestry and Fire Protection Proposes Development on Unsafe Roads in Fire-Prone Areas

Fire experts are calling on the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection to reconsider proposals that weaken long-standing regulations to keep communities safe. At a time when climate change impacts are causing more intense and frequent wildfires with devastating loss to lives and property, Governor Newsom’s BOF is proposing major revisions that would substantially weaken State minimum fire safe regulations that were enacted in 1991.

Those regulations allowed for concurrent safe ingress of firefighting equipment and personnel, while also providing for safe civilian evacuations. As wildfires have become more prevalent, it is even more important to provide firefighters and civilians with minimum safety standards for evacuation routes. The Board of Forestry’s updated regulations do the exact opposite.

“I find it absurd that we are throwing tens of millions of dollars at our fire suppression capabilities but removing some of the safety and fire protection regulations that were developed in response to previous catastrophic and tragic events. The Board of Forestry’s updated regulations remove long-standing safety standards in high fire danger areas, which will likely risk fire fighter and civilian lives,” said David Hillman, retired Deputy Director of Cal Fire who participated in the drafting and implementation of the 1991 state minimum fire safe regulations.

The Fire Chief’s Working Group is a team of fire captains and marshals from across the state who were brought in to consult the BOF on safe fire management policies in 2020. They recommended maintaining a minimum 20’ roadway and reducing dead end roads from 1 mile to ½ mile in response to increasingly dangerous wildfires.  Unfortunately, the BOF is ignoring the advice of the Fire Chiefs and long-standing regulationsby substantially weakening the standards for all existing roads on which most new development occurs.

Both existing communities and new developments evacuate via existing roads, where evacuations are already dangerous, further increasing wildfire risk to lives and property, straining firefighting budgets, and jeopardizing property insurance. Yet the BOF has offered no analysis to assess these serious risks.

Recent court decisions have sided with challengers of project approvals because they failed to provide for adequate wildfire and evacuation analysis. The Attorney General joined a recent Lake County lawsuit, which argued that many mitigations offered by the developer didn’t ensure safe evacuation on existing road infrastructure.

Local jurisdictions emboldened by the Governor’s pro-housing message have been lobbying to overturn the regulations, but fire experts warn, these regulations if weakened will cost lives. In a January 3, 2022 letter, 21 wildfire professionals claim, “The lack of adequate ingress and egress for residents and first responders significantly contributed to the recent losses of lives and properties in California’s wildfires.”

According to State Alliance for Firesafe Road Regulations member Steve Drimmer, “The BOF must require data-supported analyses of existing road capacity and impacts to evacuation response times during wildfire emergencies.” The BOF’s refusal to require local jurisdictions conduct this type of analysis ignores the science that shows adding new development in wildfire-prone areas increases the risk to both existing and new communities. 


To protect lives, we must ensure project approvals require adequate access roads that provide for safe concurrent ingress and egress.



Contributions to our 501(c)(3) fiscal partner, Sonoma County Tomorrow

Tax ID #: 94-3019165 are tax deductible to the extent allowed by law.